If you currently have kids and you fall on hard times and then find you’re pregnant, is it ok to have an abortion?
If so then would it be ok to have a post birth abortion?
If it is too hard to be broke and bring more kids in the world what is the difference then? Why not have your current offspring aborted also?
This of course is a completely extreme example used to make a point, but if abortion is ok up to late term then why is it not ok post term?
The argument has been made that woman feel that they can’t afford the cost after they have the baby but also just can’t give up their baby after they have them, so they have the baby aborted instead?
So if you can’t afford to have them and you don’t want someone who can afford the child to have them, then having the baby killed is the better answer?
The whole abortion question needs to be addressed at the point of puberty for both men and woman.
First be up front about the end result when you have a child who is about to become sexually active, sex causes children.
There are alternatives such as contraceptives and birth control (neither 100%).
There are alternative sexual techniques (ask your mom and dad)
Second if you have sex, it will hopefully be with someone that is of character and will help you support your child.
We have made it easier to have sex and not live with the natural consequence of the act, while at the same time not reinforcing the family that would naturally take care of the mother and child.
We have to stop saying we are anti-abortion or pro life, when the truth is we are pro child before and after birth.
Sunday, June 7, 2009
at
3:51 AM
Posted by
Jimmie T.
Archivado en:
0 comments:
Post a Comment