what you can expect from this government

The president claims that health care is a right, then you must assume that other more important things are a right and should be granted by the government.
1st Right (Food)
To survive you must have food, if Government health care is a right then food is the first of all rights as no one can survive with out food and no one should die from lack of food.
We should provide each and every family with food enough to survive , those who make a profit should be made to pay More at the cash register to support those to lazy to to earn the money to shop at the best of stores just because of the cost.
Food is also a major reason for the need for increased health care spending, so the amount we let people eat should be controlled as well as the type of food they eat!
Any and all junk food white bread and other unhealthy foods should be done away with, just think a law can be passed and no more fat people!
This would be the way for Government to ensure peoples rights to good healthy food!
2nd Right (Shelter)
There is no reason for people to be homeless, everyone should have a home of their own and no one should go broke having to pay for a house that the government can pay for. A house that is built by the government will help bring down the cost of homes because competition is good, all you have to do is increase the cost of the homes from people who can afford them to pay for the houses of the needy.
To stop homelessness you could also tax the stars, they should be made to give back the money to their rightful owners, so the homeless could live regular lives. This would also allow them to be healthier, along with providing for their first right (Food) the could again be happy people.
3rd right (Employment)
The right to have a personally rewarding job that will allow people to feel good about themselves, it doesn't matter if they can do the job as long ans they feel good about themselves.
We can make others who have jobs either give up some of their hours or take a cut in pay, that or they can even go as far as giving up their position and moving back to their roots at the bottom.
4th right (transportation)
It doesn't help to provide for the other rights if unless everyone has a means of transportation, How till they get to their work or visit their friends houses to find ways to get more government aid. That and how will people be able to drive to the convenience store for their cigarette's and beer? It should be easy to provide a car for people since the people already own a car company. (Government Motors).
Once all these rights are taken care of I think we won't have to worry about health care because who needs health care when you don't have freedom.
This is the direction the country is going and if you don't believe it then just look at Cuba, Venezuela and the Peoples Republic of Korea (North Korea).
They have so many rights which even include free health care, they just don't have freedom.

A movie Quote

It's always safe to denounce the rich, everyone will help you. The rich first!
(from the Fountainhead by Ayn Rand)
We see an America that is being run by 60's and 70's radicals who were rich and hated the freedom of the American people, they claimed to love America while at the same time trying to break down the core of the Representative Republic. They have now gotten to a point that they have the chance to do it, it is the 60's revolution now coming to a point of victory. Will we let them? can we stop them? what must we do!
We must do the one thing that they would never think of, we must come up with clear easily defined answers to the real problems of today.
When we do that the conservative will save America and make this a great country once again.

Three steps to break America

The President has driven me to constantly think about the individual as he stands now with all this collective think (Socialism), new speak and the trickery that is trying to destroy the individual. You may say how is this President attacking the individual? His policies, from the implementation of the increase numbers of Czars to Cap and Trade and last Universal Health care are all simply just a means to disarm the individual.
Czars work as the Presidents means to destroy out founding fathers experiment of a constitutional Government that is our "Republic".
The individuals most sacred document (the Constitution of the United States) called for the Government to protect the freedoms of the individual and their freedom, freedom that set our country apart from the others.
The Czars must go to protect the form Government that stands for the individual. Cap and trade is a Marxist type of punitive tax that effects every American at every level, you will pay more to industry meet the requirements of Government Regulation.
In the Punishment that is cap and trade you the individual will see more of your dollars go so the Government can distribute your money to those they choose. This is contrary to all of our principles that we teach our kids or that we hope to see in our family and our future.
We are expected to work together so we can help each other yet you can't help an individual who doesn't want to help themselves.
this is the cap and trade goal as I see it, take from those who do and succeed and give to those who are less able.
It is a way to enslave the people who strive for success, even though actual slavery is illegal mental slavery is being advocated by our Government.
The Universal Health care plan is the last move that the Government has, to use benevolence to enslave the people who succeed and those who don't. Those who succeed will be forced to pay more ,yet still they will be called cruel and callus or full of hate if they don't want to give freely.
Like the unions who drove the corporations to bankruptcy and made them go to the Government to surrender, the Government will do the same to the individual in hope of making them join the collective and surrendering to the Government.
It will be the collective group thought with everything the individual thinks or does becoming second to what the group wants. You will not be able to have the ability to work with your doctors, it will be decided by others, it may not happen today but it will happen.
Because of the great orator in chief's skills, people will beg for their freedoms to be taken from them under the ruse of being safe and secure.

My Mantra is stay out of our homes, stay out of our pocket and stay out of our way because we are going to save America.
By this I will fight the Czars, The cap and trade and Universal health care.

Response to Letter to Editor at Chronicleonline.com

Suzan Franks is a typical politician in the sense that they complain about high prices in the private sector but have no problem with out federal Government increasing (taxes) rates.
The letter to the editor (09/20/09) talked about how progress energy wants to impose a tax on it's rate payers.
Is Mrs. Franks now so against imposing a tax rate increase that she will speak out against the cap and trade? Which is on a rate increase on even the most indigent of energy consumers.
Will her organizations "Citizens for Rate Payer Rights" that is 10,000 strong, send someone to the white house to complain?
She must be aware of how the President ignores the millions of people who are speaking out against his policies of increase rates. Is she a typical politicians or will she cross party lines like so many of the others in support of the Tea Party who speak out against the cap and trade rate increase or will she only speak out against Republicans? This is your chance Mrs. Franks to prove your letter to the editor wasn't just a political hit on still another Republican and your really against rate increases. Be it Federal, State or Other. If not I say in Mrs. Franks own words "shame on you".

Univeral healthcare, not what we need!

You see the Government is currently telling you that millions of people are in crisis because they don’t have healthcare. Yet how many more millions are in crisis because they can’t get to work in a reliable care? An individual without a reliable car has an increased chance of losing their jobs, costing them and the economy more than can be estimated by my humble means. But if they had a new car (say from a government owned car company), they could make it to work and have a better chance of succeeding at their jobs and the bosses would lose less money. This would also put more money into the pocket of the individual and allow them to pay for that healthcare that they so easily claim is a human right.
The truth is I don’t think the government should give anyone a car or universal healthcare.
I think that government should stop being so wasteful with our tax dollars that they have to take more, claiming that because people can’t afford health insurance they will pay for it with yet still more taxes. The problem is that it is a vicious cycle of government taking more of the individual’s money through taxes, then offering help because of the lack of money due to over taxation.
If you turn on the light it’s them in your house, look at every bill and you will see that government has its hands deep in your pockets, we are overburdened with taxes preventing success, and they are in your way.
What does this government do? It over taxes but offers more entitlements yet because of this people can’t afford things in their life like healthinsurance.
What is the answer? Well there is a big movement called the Tea Party or you can work at your own level by writing you elected officials. Tell them this simple message, stay out of our homes, stay out of our pocket and stay out of our way. We will fix America!

Am I my brothers keeper?

In all my life I have been taught that team work is important to success, be it sports or work. We are taught this from the very beginning of our life and we teach it to our children as soon as they can, why is it then that we punish the individual and not the whole team when someone does wrong.
This shows the fault of the collective or team mentality, why in the long run it won’t work.
It is the individual who makes things happen, when each individual achieves or strives to achieve their best the team or collective is then rewarded, but because you can not force those who wish to put less effort into things to perform their best the team or collective concept cannot be forced to work. No individual has ever failed who put forth their best effort, regardless of the results, because of this philosophy we cannot be our brother’s keeper, because when we choose as an individual to let the actions of others take control of us, the choice to give our best for ourselves is pointless and watered down.
If and when I make the conscience choice to help I do it because I benefit in some way. Helping kids in the community helps me in that there is a better chance of lower crime rate. Yet giving my money or food to others out of charity doesn’t help me as an individual at all. People will say but how can you stand by and does nothing as others fail? I say easy, I am giving them the motivation to do something to succeed because as long as they can take from me they have no need to succeed on their own.
More will say, but what about the infirm or those who are of a mental defect that doesn’t allow them to succeed. This is the most difficult point for an individual with a heart, yet I think that if someone is infirm and tries to do their best then it will benefit me to help because we can both get something from each other.
Yet if they are infirm and sit home and say feed me, help me, or do for me, I say turn a blind eye!
The only ones who should be assisted are the mentally ill that can do nothing what so ever, to those I say you will have my assistance. Because you truly have no choice to help, this brother I will keep.
It is the individual not the team, it is the individual not my brother, it is the individual not my country that must be first to succeed. And when we realize it’s because of the individual, then my brother, team, country and all can be great.

A please and thank you mob.

I spoke at the Crystal River Tea Party (9-12-09) and have to say I was so pleased by the type of people that showed.
People of all ages showed, people of all financial status showed (O.K. Bill Gates never made it), the one thing about this group that would be called a mob by is that everyone said please and thank you.
This group of Tea Party supporters is indicative of the average American. Food was brought to the event by individuals in support of individuals in need, support by individuals not the government is what many of the Tea Party thinks and wants.
They stayed in the rain to hear people speak, they never booed or complained. None of the speakers or supporters asked for the government to give them anything. Unlike those in opposition who showed up holding signs (very nice mass produced signs, wonder who is getting support and who is the grassroots) that asked for big business to pay their fair share. The opposition who wants the government to use its ability to take from us, by making it sound like big business will just pay more in taxes, when the truth is that business’ just get more out of our pocket and pass it to government.
The people at the Tea Party stand for freedom and they support the individual as the answer, not the collective of government.
The Tea Party supporters know that many have sat still too long, while our freedoms are slowly being suppressed. The average American who makes up the Tea Party are now awake and ready to step up and be heard, the march on Washington was a call to end the expansion of government. This march was a protest march that was in a size not seen before and even thought they packed the streets you don’t hear stories about rowdy protesters, passionate statements but no violence. See what happens when a pro-America, freedom loving mob gets together, it becomes a please and thank you mob!
A special thanks to Edna, great job!

The truth about our government being oppressive

Oppression by charity and benevolence

Oppression

Unjust or cruel exercise of authority or power; A sense of being weighed down in body or mind.

Charity

Generosity and helpfulness especially towards the needy or suffering; also :aid given to those in need.

Benevolence

Marked by or disposed to doing good ; organized for the purpose of doing good.

In our modern society it has gotten to be clear that our Government has started to become oppressive to those they have sworn to protect and defend. By over taxation, imposition of fees and penalties and establishment of regulation our Government stifles the pursuit of happiness by those I call the "doers", in a free society. Because of this there are many more people who lose the spirit to strive for success and happiness. The result is a need to do something about those that made a deliberate choice to put as little energy into their lives as others. In the past people like that fell by the wayside, today they are pandered to by a politician who wants the votes. They start programs of entitlement that are basically a type of government charity.
This charity is abused at so many levels, between looter classes that pass on the secrets of how to bilk the system. To the administrators who are as liable for the fraud for giving approval for entitlements to obvious looters. All in the name of being charitable to what many call the needy, when it's obvious that it is too easy to be charitable with other people’s money. We are oppressing the doers by taking from them, putting weight on them to produce and be profitable so that their success can be shared with the looters in the name of charity. To the doers our government says now that you have done well and produced a profit you will pay that to the looters who don't make profit for themselves or others. This is oppression!!! People in the government and many in the populous say, but we are in support of this because it's only being done in the name of helping others and this shows how benevolent the government is. Yet how can this government be benevolent and oppressive?
It is wrong for the government to say if you are profitable we will take your money from you and give it to those they choose.
Is this government benevolent? I say no, it is the obvious contradiction to benevolence because to take from one to give to others without the choice is oppressive. Your law abiding doer understands that, government taxes to be able maintain infrastructure as well as defend the populous. It is not even part of the equation it is part of the oldest agreement in the country. After that for the government to come and take from you to do charity to others in the name of benevolence, is oppression.

Important

Don't forget the Tea Party in Crystal river on the 12th of September

My suggestion for healthcare changes

How about instead of a government plan (call it what you want it is still run by the government), why not really fix the problem of people loosing it all because of the cost of healthcare. Establish a fund that will provide a tax free and interest free fund to loan money to people who are in a situation where they can't afford to pay for their care. They could pay it back as able, when their position in life inproves the amount would have to be increased. For those who are living alone (elderly) they could pay back their care in a asset sale after their passing. For those who can't afford any means of paying back the government, you would not provide the child tax credit.
Next there needs to be a cost reduction, Tort reform would be essential in reducing cost increases. Set a cost cap for rewards (covering current and future medical care as well as cost of living changes), any punitive fees would go in to the above stated fund.
Allow federal lands to be used by those who want to start up medical facilities in the most needy communities, this would be on a cost free basis as long as that medical facility was used for medicine (not transferable to non-medical business). For those who have disabilities and get government care, allow them to earn what they want while increasing the investigation of fraud.
Pass a law that requires insurance companies to keep any patient who has a change of status unless fraud can be proven (as an example if someone gets cancer the insurance company must keep them during and after). If a insurance company has a client who is found to have had a preexisting condition that is not grounds for dropping them, a new company must take a person with preexisting conditions at the same rate as the previous company but only if the individual left the other comany because of no fault of their own (closure of the previous company).