Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Being America's Mom and Dad

We the Tea Party could best be described as the parents trying to get their kids in line. Let me give you an example from my past.

As a child I went into my mothers purse and stole $20.00 (yes I stole), I went to the store and bought as much candy from the store as I could and was just as pleased with myself as could be. When I got home I was in for a big surprise, mom took all the candy from me and gave it to everyone else. I was then strongly disciplined and explained how I had taken money that was for the groceries (basically I took food out of the mouth of my family), and that is the start of understanding that taking money from one person to give to another only hurts the first person.

We the Tea Party have to step in as the parents for our Government, we see they have taken our money and are spending it on things that help no one.

We the Tea Party members are here to give the verbal spanking that is needed; government is spoiled and now has to be taught a lesson. For years there hasn’t been much in the way of discipline, most of that is because people have steadily been given things by government without the slightest thought to the fact that higher taxes on anything is taking the food out of the mouths of families like mine.

Tax corporation and I have to pay more, fees paid by business’s and I have to pay more, higher taxes on the rich and my boss can’t pay me more (so much for that pay raise), tax me more and I of course will not be able to afford more for my government.

I wish I could teach that same lesson I learned as a kid to everyone in office, taking from one to give to another is taking money that is not yours. It is also time to send the big spenders to their room (home) that will teach them a lesson.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

What next

I read the Chronicles description of the Tea Party (16 Jan 2010) and noticed that they missed the reason for people being there. The 1,200 to 1,500 people did come to hear people like Marco Rubio and I speak, yet it was not because Rubio was running as much as the fact that people are stepping up to say what is going on in Washington is wrong and we are speaking out against it. It also is about people coming up with an answer of how to fix it. During my speech I brought up Term Limits, this was the loudest applause that I got. I have no doubt that the reason for this is that the people of America do not trust their government and are starting to say that regardless of party we need a fix, that more spending is not the answer. The people want those who in the past, have gotten us into it this situation need to get out of the way. We want someone to come in and fix it, someone who is not there for themselves.

The second biggest applause that I got was for the strong emphasis on the Fair Tax, people simply want a tax system that doesn’t punish success or give away their hard earned money to those who mooch.

We are glad that the people running for office came to speak but the media and all politicians need to know that the truth is that we want our freedom and our money to stay the same way that it was meant to be when the founders established this country.

The next fact that was missed was those in the tea party need to get out into the crowd and talk to the people, which is what I did. I found out that, people want to be more organized and get better educated. The Tea Party needs to make plans for what’s next; even if we get our people in office can we fix it. That is what we who spoke at the Tea Party need to answer! What next?

Support a Conservative, support Rubio

The Associated press article says, “Obama talks jobs in Ohio” and my guess is that he is now talking jobs because of the fact that those like the Tea Party movement and other like the 9/12 project have driven home the message. That we are not happy with our government and how it is over taxing us in both dollars and the way it is creeping into our lives.

You see this was not Sen. Elect Brown sending a message and it was not just those of us in the Republican Party, it was with out doubt the people who understand that we can not expect more government spending to get us out of this economic down turn.

The President is a great orator, yet he is tone deaf to the people and sits in his group of liberal elitist who dictate what we the people should do to make everything better. If we the flyover, country bumpkin, Pick up truck driving, menial labor doing people would just do things like them then the world would be better.

The president ran on the fact that he was going to come in and fix things yet the only thing he did was push forward the agenda of the elitist, with social program after social program. The President would be un-touchable if he would have come in and actually worked on fixing the economy instead of saying that everything was a priority or claiming that more spending would fix it. The movement behind Sen. elect Brown is going to determine the 2010 elections, we will get the message through. The problem that I foresee is that we may end up with some of the same thing we have always had, people who will say anything to get elected and then go to Washington to be part of the same old problem. Crist is a Republican and I am glad to have him in the party, yet I feel that Marco Rubio is a Conservative Republican who understands that less government is more people. That is why I support Marco Rubio for Senate.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Tea Party a success

The Citrus County Tea Party was a resounding success, it got grass roots individuals out front and allowed by applause and a few less then positive responses let people know that they are not willing to put up with how things are. it was once again a very polite group but it also was so evadent it is time for answers, not just platitued or pandering. We need to start that next step of where to go, this Tea Party is slowly coming to it's end and the people are looking for what is next.

Saturday, January 9, 2010

A bad shift.

The war has begun to shift from America being hated because we are standing up for ourselves while actually being proactive in killing or defeating the Terrorist around the world. To one of being scoffed at for our apologetic attitude and losing the war by turning the war into a law enforcement problem.

You see the CIA has in the past, been neutered by people in the Democratic Party who wanted us to not deal with criminals and recently by taking actions against our own agents because they interrogated enemy combatants (who by law could have been shot on the spot).

People are complaining that there has been a major error in not catching the Christmas bomber, the failure is being laid at the feet of the intelligence services as a way to detract from the truth. The truth is that we have chosen a president that doesn’t see the war on radical Islamic terrorist as what it is, a global war of domination in the name of a religion.

Instead he sees it as an image problem and one in which we can sit with our friends and talk the situation over, many thought that after the president went on Al Jazera and to the middle east we would see less of an effort to attack and kill Americans (boy were we wrong).

After 9/11 and the decision to actually fight the war as a war and as a covert action was made and in that people realized that we seriously lacked in the fields of human intelligence around the world.

The CIA made a huge push to get people on staff that are highly educated (college is a must), and young. They now have the problem of these young, inexperienced groups of people, agents that are pushed to have results in numbers not in quality. The field officers are station chiefs at each and every embassy, it is guaranteed that one of them were in the room when this Christmas bombers.

But because of our president’s attitude, do you think that there was a great amount of drive to get this information where it needed; instead it was most likely just getting the information in a already overloaded system.

Not only was the system overloaded with info but could you imagine that the person dealing with this guys father actually making a push to get him (the bomber) picked up by the feds and then find out that the father was wrong?

Because of his lack of experience and the president’s attitude his life as a CIA agent would be over, he would have been sent packing and worse yet he would have been called a Republican.

We need to get back to fighting the war on terror, focus on the DOD model of action and quality over quantity. Stand behind our men in the intelligence services and maybe just maybe we still have a chance to do a Patraeus / McCrystal surge to victory.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

No is the way to say YES

NO! NO! NO! As a parent that is the most common thing I say as a way to show my love and concern for my kids. No to Drugs, no to Drinking and Driving, basically no to foolish habits like those and even frivolous spending all of which will cause them to have a bad life. The Republicans have been called the party of No and the truth is I am ok with that, because I love my country and just like I do my kids it is time to tell our politicians NO!

No is actually the way to say YES to a better future for our children and also to help our country recover. I as the parent am not here to be my kid’s friend, it is my responsibility to be the parent and teach the difference between right and wrong. I am not here to be my elected officials’ friend; politicians have become like spoiled kids and have no clue what the word no is. It has become our job to be the parent in this situation and to teach them the lesson of right and wrong by telling those in elected office NO!

We have an electorate that is like your average teenager who will tell his or her parents how to do everything as if they are smarter than the parents.

Like a parents biggest fear of their kids getting hooked on drugs and alcohol. Our politicians are high on power and drunk with spending and have formed the bad habits of ignoring the will of the people (their parents). We need to talk to our politicians and tell them (possibly in the same way we speak to our children) that over spending is bad for you and will make everyone’s life harder.

The media has made it sound like saying no is the only thing that the conservative movement is doing. For the media who is a propaganda machine for this President, the first thing we conservatives do is say no. No to big spending increases, no to the take over of the economy by the government and no the encroachment of the government into every aspect of our daily lives. Put a stop to the deeper corruption of our government by saying no, only after the politicians learn that lesson can we say “YES”, yes to real answers that will solve this situation. And if not then we need to look to the 2010 elections and say no to those who can’t understand the destruction they are doing. Hopefully a politician will read this and say “how repetitive”, because if they do then my job is done. It is repetition that I use to drill the point home for my kids. NO! NO! NO!

Thursday, December 17, 2009

The future of Christmas?

Because of new climate and environmental laws, there will be no Christmas this year.

It seems one Kris Kringle, a.k.a Santa Claus, has been grounded due to advocating genocide and violation of carbon standards.

It seems that our government apprehended Santa at his North Pole residence.

The charges against him claim that Santa has inspired families to buy or cut down Christmas trees, with the sole purpose of putting presents under them.

Although, the government does admit that the holiday known as Christmas did temporarily prevent the use of the chimney, thereby saving many trees (this is the main entrance for Santa on Christmas Eve).

The overall effect is mitigated by the millions of trees killed, decorated and disposed of each year.

The government commented that Santa is a co-conspirator and that a warrant has been issued for one Jesus of Nazareth (the reason for the season). It is stated that this other wanted person apparently left town some time ago [whereabouts unknown] with no idea of when he might return.

Sources further claim that Santa has not hired a lawyer yet, but during processing at a federal prison, Santa was found to have a bag of coal. This didn't bother the federal agents till it was found that the names of all elected officials in government were on each piece of coal.

Failing to prove invasion of privacy by St. Nick, the feds charged him with violation of pollution standards for improperly storing the coal in violation of E.P.A. standards.

Prosecutors were said to be trying to work a deal, suggesting that if Santa could help with the passing of healthcare reform for the President, the charges could be dropped.

Sources are reported to say that the only response was HO, HO, HELL NO!

What would Suess say about taxes

Tax, tax, tax.

Oh the taxes we will pay,

work all day and save all night because of the taxes you will pay.

Go to work to your job, oh the taxes you do pay.

Own a car, fill it up,

and speed up the taxes you do pay.

Buying food at the store, on your plate you'll be taxed some more.

Have a phone and you will see that ringing tone is taxing you and me.

Taxed to pay for things we need, taxes to pay for their political greed.

Taxed all morning and through the day, Taxed Enough Already is what we say.

Government should spend less instead of taxing more; can’t politicians stop acting like a fiscal whore?

All the money you could ever spend, tax, tax, and taxed again.

Will this spending never end, one way to stop it is with a friend.

Start at the rallies, together you must go.

To stop the tax and the spending show, our voices louder as the crowds do show.

President Obama don't you know, the conservative movement steadily grows.

What to do and where to go, to the poles don't you know.

Back to being a republic we must fly, so our country doesn't wither and die.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

We need a real Robin Hood

Everyone knows the tale of Robin Hood and how he stole from the rich and gave to the poor, but what would you say if I told you that the premise of the story is not true? Fact is, he and his merry men risked all to steal from the government (the king) and gave back to the tax payers (the poor). He had many rich friends, like Maid Marian, from whom he never stole. It was always the Sheriff of Nottingham and the lords who profited from the taxes that he would ambush in the woods. Robin never went to the merchants and took from them, because they, like the average citizen, were overly taxed. His sole focus was the sheriff and the other lords who went around “raping” the people of all that they had earned. I point this out because in our modern day we have President Obama who came into office like Errol Flynn swinging in with all the flair of the hero in the classic black and white film. He stood there with a smile saying, “I am going to take from the rich and give to the poor,” and people ate it up in heaps because of the fear stirred up by the media.

But now we have regrets, because we are further in debt and have even more unemployment than predicted. By electing Obama, people didn’t get Robin Hood, instead they got the Sheriff of Nottingham. And instead of robbing from the rich, he is imposing more taxes, including increased taxes on your bosses along with other planned taxes that will prevent businesses from hiring or expanding. We will soon have higher healthcare premiums as well. All of this makes the other lords (Pelosi, Reed, Frank) happy.

What we need is a modern day Robin Hood (regardless of party) who will take back from the government what it has wrongfully taken (through over taxation) from the tax payers and who, instead of using the sword, will use answers and reason to fight an increasingly oppressive federal government. Our modern day Robin would push to end an entitlement society that allows people to steal the hard earned dollars from you and me and puts into effect an incentive policy that makes people want to work—instead of sitting at home living off of Social Security disability or welfare. [You know them. They are the ones you heard talking about how to get on the welfare rolls even though they are fully capable of working.] Our Robin would know that the answer to helping everyone includes implementing a Fair Tax (which makes us more competitive on the world markets), term limits (to prevent the problem of life-long members), tort reform (which would include the end to the class action suits), smaller government (get rid of redundancy) and the implementation of laws that encourage the medical system to fix the problems and provide what doctors and patients want.

I would like people to know that I am being general about people on welfare, Social Security disability and other programs—but the system is rife with people who are able to work, yet choose to take the easy route in life that requires little more than to show up for the check and keep complaining about medical problems.

Robin Hood took from the government and gave back to the tax payers, because he knew that what was rightfully theirs should not be taken away in order for those in government to just continue to increase their influence. A Robin Hood like this is what I would call a real hero. The question is: where is he and would anyone actually support him besides me?

Jimmie T. Smith

(With editing by Gail Hollenbeck)

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Obama, Not so funny.

Is President Obama following the examples of Rufus T. Firefly, the Fictional President of Freedonia (from the Marx brother’s movie Duck Soup)?

Swept into office by ardent supporters who had a blind faith in his ability, he has come into office making rules that make no sense and he doesn't plan on following.

And as he talked fast an assured, he blinded everyone till they realized what he had said. Now you find it was all just a song and dance.

The problem is that unlike a move or what his Hollywood supporters think, this is reality and not some funny movie where we laugh till the end.

America is in crisis, I know people say it was President Bush's fault and to some extent I agree. The lack of vetoes on run away spending was a major concern; he should have vetoed wasteful spending bills regardless of which party sponsored it.

Yet it is a fact that our current President came in with a funny song and dance routine of how to fix things, when as a straight man he isn't qualified to run a quick mart store.

He has simply been a front man for all the Democrats that were looking for someone who could sell the people of America their policies.

A stimulus bill written by an organization that has an agenda, health bill by a party that thinks it knows better than doctors or patients, and a cap and trade bill that is in support of fraudulent scientist theory.

Our president claimed to be someone who was going to work to fix what was broke in Washington.

Still days go by and you see, not only did he not stop the show he taught everyone a new step that no one can keep up with.

The song and dance routine that Rufus T. Firefly did was funny and as a movie it made fun of politicians.

Obama's song and dance isn't funny and instead of making fun of politicians he laughing at us.

Groucho funny, Obama not so much. Maybe a mustache and cigar will help.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

All hail?

When President Obama came into office people said it was another Camelot, similar to the days of Kennedy. What they got wrong was that it was Camelot, similar to being ruled by a king, where the people are no longer able to have a say in how their country is run. There was a large part of this population that didn’t vote for this President, now that part of this population has no voice. The President talked about a by partisanship unlike that of the previous President yet he gets less votes from the opposition than the previous President.

That doesn’t bother our President because he is now ruling, making decisions about our lives as if he was the king of America. Keeping those who don’t agree with him out of the loop when it comes to making the decisions to guide America and basically ruling in a way that is reminiscent of how people of the revolution saw the king of England.

Having a different standard of how those who are in charge are able to define things, like when it is said that this administration would be the most open and post legislation on the web 5 days prior to a vote. Then not doing it till there is public outcry.

They look at those who would speak out against their policies as an enemy; they claim they (Tea Party Members) are just big corporation when the truth is it is you and I out there as individuals. I guess in the eyes of the President we are the ENEMY. Just like the king of England thought of the citizens of America who disagreed with his policies, do you wonder why there is a revolution brewing at the grassroots. We now stand at the very beginning of what is a revolution of the technological type, we blog and meet and basically share the information on the internet that the President doesn’t want us to know.

I don’t say all hail Obama, I say Oh Hell.

It is time for we the people to revolt against the king.

Monday, November 23, 2009

Could we have the answers

I have a suggestion for a new movement.
Please tell me what you think.

The Federalist

Motto "The individual is the answer".

Inspired by federalist paper #57

This organization is to come up with answers, to develop a way for the average American citizen to have a say.

"Who are to be the electors of the federal representatives? Not the rich, more than the poor; not the learned, more than the ignorant; not the haughty heirs of distinguished names, more than the humble sons of obscurity and unpropitious fortune. The electors are to be the great body of the people of the United States."

(James Madison)

This should be the goal of this organization.

This is only the shell of what could be a group or a way for Americans to be involved.

No party, just show up and participate.



The Federalist is an organization of individuals that are not affiliate to any party and by its charter is subordinate to the individual.

This organization is formed in the sense that government should be, of the people, by the people and for the people.

The federalist will come up with the answer (created by the individual) to stop the people from becoming indentured servants and to stop the abuse of entitlements by a sub-society that empowers the few at the punishment of the many.

A basic outline of how this organization would work.

The organization would consist of a president, a vice president, a secretary, a media representative, and a treasurer.

Rules of meeting would follow Roberts’s rules of organization.

Finances would follow the 501-3c rule and would be run in a non-profit format.

Format for meeting.
Call to order.
Pledge.
Prayer (when some one is available if not then a minute of self prayer).
Finance report
Old business, with the review of past subjects drafted as resolution followed by the call to
continue on old groups’
new business.
Organization business
the president ask if there are subjects (topics of interest) that people would like to develop answers for.
Call for answers
reading of answers and the turning over for draft to resolution format
adjournment

if a subject is brought up then that individual will step aside as a rally point, the president then will address all interested parties to join that individual.
If no others join that individual then, that individual will be the sole developer of a prospective answer.
Once that group has been formed, for the time of that meeting will be locked.
If any individual out of that group at some time during the meeting has a thought to add to the subject, that thought must be written anonymously and the vice-president will deliver it to the group for consideration.

Subsequent groups will be formulated in the same fashion. An individual shall only actively participate in one group at a meeting.

Individuals are not required to remain in any one group at following meetings.

At the end of the meeting the groups will bring up any completed answers, those answers will be read allowed.
If a subject is not ready for submission it will be tabled and called forth at the next meeting to be continued.
Answers will be submitted to the secretary to be drafted as a resolution.
The resolution must be submitted for review by any of the original drafters.
The resolution will be brought to the following meeting to be signed by any and all participants who wish to support it and then submitted (being posted on any website the organization might have and sent to all elected officials in both electronic and hard copy).

Jimmie T. Smith

Madison said it couldn't happen / Politicians are trying to prove him wrong

If this spirit shall ever be so far debased as to tolerate a law not obligatory on the legislature, as well as on the people, the people will be prepared to tolerate any thing but liberty. (James Madison)

It started decades ago, we let the elected officials become something that they were never meant to be.

We granted them a status of being something special, now our elected officials are in power and will offer you the constituents almost any program or entitlement you could want if you would just reelect them.

Worse yet they are in a contest to grant more than their opponent come election time, this of course is done with your money.

We have gotten into such an entitlement hole that you can now live cradle to grave all of someone else dollar and just so you know that someone else is you and I.

The other part of this is those who elect these people, you can see in the letters to the editors of your local paper that if you disagree with legislation to have our government give more of your money away, well then you’re just a shrill for some big business.

There was a letter in the citrus county chronicle in which the person made comments of how people who disagree with the Health care reform bill, well we are all just dopes paid by the Insurance companies.

Truth is its just people like you and I speaking out

When our leaders live at a different standard, than you and I, we are obligated as residents of this Republic to make the choice of either stand up and correct it or tolerate it and loose our liberty.

I for one say it starts with the tax dollars and saying mine is mine and moving on to going to events, meetings and if need be forming a movement. We must stop the theft of our successes, because we the people will not tolerate the loss of our liberty, no matter how our politicians try to sell it.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Tired of politicians who pander, what about answer. Here is an example.

The problem with politics is that it gets in the way of our lives, they make laws that not needed or useful. The example is the fight about Gay marriage, this being on one side a fight against people specifically calling the union between man and woman marriage.

The other saying it is bigoted and that two people should be able to be together and have the same rights and be able to share things like work benefits (insurance) with their respective partners.

Here is what I call an easy answer, make a law that says any two individuals living in a mutually supporting relationship under the same house will upon signing a contract of mutual support be granted all or any benefits and rights allowed by those of a man and woman in marriage.

This would allow two elderly people who want to co-exist, be able use the insurance benefits without the requirements of a sexual relationship. By signing this contract it would require the two individuals to live under the same roof like a man and a woman so as to prevent the corruption of the system. Further it should be stated in the law that this contract can’t be cancel without six month notice intent of cancelation.

This is an example of the individual pointing out that we don’t want a wasteful argument as we have had in the past, we want real answers and real solutions. Either that or get out of our government, we don’t have time for politicians who pander.

Letter to the Tea Party

Prior to the invasion of Europe by Allied forces general Eisenhower drafted a letter.

Below is a letter to tea party members and like minded (individuals), in the spirit of the letter to invading forces.

Taxpayers, producers, and businessmen of the United States of America, earlier this spring you came together in a campaign, toward which we have found a need to stop the movement away from a Government of Republican principles.

All though our leaders have claimed to not have heard from you, be assured the world is listening.

The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere stand with you.

In the company of brave individuals, your brothers-in-arms all across America will bring about the reestablishment of a true republic. Eliminate as much as possible corrupt politicians and re-secure a truly free future.

Your task will not be an easy one, your opponents are well supported, passionate and battle tested.

They will defend themselves with claims of hatred, racism and other detractors from the facts.

Yet this is 2009 and our opponents have shown themselves, the united effort of the Tea Party, the 9/12 projects and others have inflicted damage upon a political machine that drives us towards socialism.

Our rallies, letters, calls, and E-mails have seriously reduced the blind following.

Our love of the individual, our families and our country has given us an overwhelming superiority in ideas and answers.

The tide has turned! The freedom loving individuals are standing together for victory.

I have full confidence in your courage, devotion to freedom and your willingness to right this wrong.

We will accept nothing less than full victory. Let us all beseech the blessing of almighty god upon this great and noble undertaking.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Resolved

Resolved, that is one of the most important terms ever used by our Government and more so the founding fathers.

We see America changing to a country that is being increasingly run by a federal Government, standing in absolute contrast with the constitution as written by our founding fathers.

We as a people must once again resolve to throw off the shackles of oppression, this time from our very own government as warned possible by the signers of our Declaration of Independence.

The American people are now in a state of bearing the weight brought by politicians in the form of taxations.

This over taxation as a way to pay for entitlements is forewarned by our founding fathers “as a way for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried”.

The American people also find themselves enslaved to a portion of the populous that gladly grants Government more influence over their daily lives, as a way to not have to work to find success in life, liberty or the pursuit of happiness.

These people gladly enter into slavery and drag the rest of us as well, so government will grant them a modicum of a meager life, a small amount of liberty as well as a sense of happiness.

The American people must resolve to return to a Republic that lifts the burden of paying for those who will not stand free of the enslavement of entitlements provided by less than moral politicians who use benevolence as a way to gain power.

The argument of freedom and enslavement has been settled long ago in the history of our blessed country. From the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, Supreme Court decisions and the Civil Rights act.

People have fought physical oppression and enslavement, yet as civilization has given way to the technical age we have found there are still millions of poor and down trodden.

We now recognize this is because of a form of oppression that has not been seen since our Independence, that of taxation without representation. You say we have representation, yet the very representatives we vote for often are just as bad as kings of the past.

We as Americans must resolve to reign in our Government and elected officials at all points.

It is their by resolved that we the people of America having tired of corruption, do require that our elected officials at all levels shall move forward on a constitutional amendment to establish term and age limits.

It is further resolved that the oppression felt by all productive citizens be relieved by the implementation of a consumption tax (fair tax) as already in front of the House and Senate. Finally we the people in the strongest of terms want an end to an entitlement society that tamps the spirit of freedom and enslaves to government, citizens of average standing.

It is their by resolved that all federal entitlement programs be audited for fraud, the punishment for this being a 2 year restriction from authorization to use any entitlements. Further more all federal agencies and organizations in which any entitlements is issued be review annually to determine redundancy and that of any redundancy be rectified by consolidation or elimination.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Defend the Republic

Healthcare reform? Insurance reform? Government control? medical spending (Medicare) will be slashed, yet spending on community entities will have grants. These community entities will only have to prove that they had community activity and experience with healthcare workers. no qualifications needed, no certification no proof of that Nancy Pelosi guaranteed quality and no proof any of this will produce success. more people in these programs will be informing people of their benefits and acting as interpreters as well as pushing diversity, instead of using the same money to take care of the sick. all this will support the liberal agenda, because those who will run these programs will end up being the same kind of radical as those who run ACORN or in positions as the czars. They will pander to people by giving preference in regard to race, ethnicity and gender instead of qualifications. This is being done (the mass give away of funds) to further liberal control over the American people instead of working to fix the government installed HMO's that got us in this situation. to see more of how your government wants control of your healthcare go to

www.defendyourhealthcare.us

Get informed, get involved and protect our republic!

The looters have struck

The looters have struck what is a devastating blow to the individual and worse yet to freedom.
Those who loot by reaching into your paycheck (the Democratic led congress) have voted themselves yet more power to reach even deeper then before.
If as an individual you are successful you will directly pay more out of your pocket for health insurance as well as everything else.
If you own a business you will be punished so that your profits will be less what you pay your employees will be less and what you charge will be more.
as an average person of modest means you will pay for our looters in congress' decision, your prices on everything must go up to pay for this bill.
It may only go up penny's here or there but the idea of Ben Franklin's "a penny saved is a penny earned" is now dead at the hands of the health care bill.
The looters have killed Ben Franklin sound and timeless advice, just like his claim that we had a Republic for as long as we could keep it.
We now are about to get what our founding fathers feared, a true Democracy in which the mob rules.
if not held in check this could end our Republic and the things that made America great.
All this because the previous governments gave us a failing system called HMO's and now the looters in the form of an angry mob (called Democrats) chose a leader (President Obama) that is willing to loot the last of Americas wealth. This health care legislation gives government more control, the taking over of the financial system wasn't enough, corporations weren’t enough and we know health care won't be either.
the only answer is the tea party movement and fiscal conservatives, don't let Democracy kill the republic.
Fight the looters by voting for the conservatives, keep America a free country.

It is our governments job to protect the rights of the individual, yet when our government is attacked by an agenda such as we see now it is up to us as individuals to come to it's aid
We the producers worked so hard at making our future better that we let the looters and moochers walk right in. It is time to close the door on this radical leftist agenda before it is too late. We can set America straight again, but it will take each one of us to build a grassroots movement to set America back on the path to stay the shining city on the hill.
Our forefathers stepped up to make america free, our grandparents stood fought against nazism and our parents defeated the spread of communism. Now it is your turn to stand up for your rights against a socialist movement in america, you are the next great generation and that time to stand up starts now, today, here.
We occupy that shinning city our ancestors built and we do not want the lights to go out, so go today and be what is needed to make america great, stand up for freedom.

Monday, November 9, 2009

Public option Government theft.

If you support a “public option” and want the Government to fix the medical system, then you have to admit that your ok with higher taxes.

Sure if your poor you assume that this increase in taxes will just be on the rich. Eventually you will pay more at the cash register (just pennies but it will be more), of course then it will be to late.

If you support this and your rich then in the bigger picture you will not be as hurt as bad because you probably own a business and will simply transfer the cost to your customers.

Last if your middle class like myself you will be hurt the most, you probably have insurance and will have to pay more for it and if not you’ll pay some kind of penalty. Next your pocket will be picket because you probably spend more at the store then the poor and in this category you are less care about than the average citizen because you might vote but you probably won’t make noise about the change.

Of all three groups those who think that universal healthcare is ok (the use of tax money to pay for healthcare) then I have a question.

Which one of you are willing to pay for someone else up front?

If you think it’s ok to reach into my pocket to take my money, why not just go to an area where the homeless congregate and make this offer.

Offer to take them to your doctor and pay for it out of your pocket directly.

What no takers?

That is normal, people don’t want to pay for it themselves they want someone else to pay for it in the form of the government taking it from me by force to pay for someone else.

How ‘s that right? How’s that legal? How’s that constitutional?

The reason that they do it is that they don’t care because other people will make more noise than I do and because I quietly go to work and raise my family my rights are not as important as those who make more noise.

I make less noise so politicians think I have less rights, like my right to the pursuit of happiness through the ability to enjoy my effort. This being done through the money which I make and as always makes me ask how much of mine is mine?

If you look at the taxes I pay and how they are going to be spent on others healthcare I guess not much of mine is mine any more when it comes to this legislation.

Jimmie T. Smith